RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05286
					COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational 
benefits to his spouse.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is not planning to use the benefits and would like to transfer 
them to his spouse rather than waste such a valuable benefit.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 6 Apr 89, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air 
Force.

On 5 Apr 09, the applicant completed 20 years of active duty.  

On 1 Nov 10, the applicant retired and was credited with 21 years, 
6 months, and 25 days of active service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-
2306, Voluntary Education Programs, Attachment 9, A9. l 8. 7.1., 
members must request the TEB while on active duty.  There is no 
evidence in Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) or the Right Now 
Technology that the applicant ever applied for or inquired about 
the TEB program.  The applicant provides no evidence that an 
injustice occurred.

The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 10 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days  As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-05286 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 13.
	Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 16 Dec 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.